Mamba

Logo

Documentation of the Mamba Language

View the Project on GitHub JSAbrahams/mamba_doc

🏠 Home

2 🛠 Features

2.4 ⛑ Safety

2.4.3 Null Safety

We wish to be explicit about a function which may return nothing, as the user of the function might expect a value.

For this we use the question mark symbol: ?

Take the following:

# type error! 'get' function might return nothing
def my_function(set: Set[Int], str: String): Int => set get str 

The type checker is complaining that the get function from Set might return undefined. To circumvent this, we make the return type of the function nullable.

def my_function(set: Set[String], str: String): String? => set get str

Now when calling my function, I will either get an Int or a undefined. Because this is explicit, we know this at compile time. To cal a function on the resulting value, we may use the ?and operator.

def set ofmut <- { "hello" }
def str_1 <- "hello"

my_function(set, str_1) ? push "world" # only invoke push if my_function does not return undefined 
my_function(set, str_1)? push "is"     # you can also place the ? directly after the returned value
my_function(set, str_1)?.push "easy"   # if you use a dot, it must come after the ?, which is part of the value

If we try to call a function or access a definition of the function directly we get a type error:

# type error! called `push` on an object which might be undefined
my_function(set, str_1) push "world" 

Default values

In some situations, we want to have a default value. In such situations, we use the ?or operator. Note that both sides of the operator must be of the same type.

    def world <- my_function(set, "world") ?or "world"
    
    # here, world is of type String
    
    def other <- my_function(set, "other")
    
    # here, other is of type String?, as we do not know whehter it is a String or undefined

You can also return undefined in a function:

def special_function(x: Int): Int? => if x > 10 then x else undefined